Search movies

Typing something do you want to search. Exam: Movie Name, Actor, Release Year, Director...
if you want to find exactly, Please input keywords with double-quote or using multi keywords. Exam: "Keyword 1" "Keyword 2"



Genders: Adventure, Drama, Mystery, Family

Director: Martin Scorsese

Writer: John Logan, Brian Selznick

Actors: Asa Butterfield, Chloë Grace Moretz, Christopher Lee, Ben Kingsley

Year: 2011
Run time: 2h 6min
IMDB score: 7.6
Updated: 2 years ago

Movie infomation

Movie name: Hugo

Genders: Adventure, Drama, Mystery, Family

Imdb Score: 7.6

Runtime: 2h 6min

Released: 23 Nov 2011

Director: Martin Scorsese

Writer: John Logan, Brian Selznick

Actors: Asa Butterfield, Chloë Grace Moretz, Christopher Lee, Ben Kingsley

Box Office: $73.8M

Company: Paramount Studios


Imdb Link

Hugo Available Subtitles

English subtitles Hugo2 years ago
English subtitles Hugo2 years ago
Danish subtitles Hugo3 years ago
German subtitles Hugo3 years ago
English subtitles Hugo3 years ago
English subtitles Hugo4 years ago
English subtitles Hugo4 years ago
English subtitles Hugo4 years ago
English subtitles Hugo4 years ago
Vietnamese subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Romanian subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Chinese subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Croatian subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Portuguese subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Farsi/Persian subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Farsi/Persian subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Hungarian subtitles Hugo5 years ago
French subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Norwegian subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Spanish subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Korean subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Serbian subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Turkish subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Brazilian Portuguese subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Indonesian subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Bulgarian subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Finnish subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Spanish subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Dutch subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Greek subtitles Hugo5 years ago
Arabic subtitles Hugo6 years ago
English subtitles Hugo6 years ago



A Visual Masterpiece, but Lacking in Everything Else

3/10 Martin Scorsese's first kid's movie falls short of its expectations. After seeing the trailers, my family and I had very high expectations for this movie, and we eagerly went out and saw it in the theaters. We walked out extremely disappointed.

First of all, the trailers were completely misleading. My first impression was that the movie was about a boy trying to uncover a great mystery left behind in the wake of his father's death. I thought the movie was going to open up into an enchanting adventure, complete with suspense, action, and magic. I didn't get any of those things. This movie starts out will a long build-up, with the audience waiting for this magical adventure to get underway, only to keep them waiting for another hour or so, where nothing interesting or magical happens.

The pacing in the movie is terrible. The movie opens with some stunning visuals, the camera panning over the Paris cityscape and eventually showing us around the train station where the protagonist, Hugo, lives. We get the story of his father's death, and are left with a sense of wonder. We want to know what the automaton is for, why Ben Kingsely's character is so bitter, and what this adventure Hugo promises his little gal-friend is and when it's going to happen. The movie starts and stops, then drags for a bit, then starts, and drags for a long time before grinding to an unsatisfying halt. The adventure doesn't happen. All that waiting around... for nothing.

I don't really know what to say about the acting in this movie. Most of the actors had good moments and bad moments. The dialog was lacking. The characters spent more time staring at each other than actually talking. Some of the facial expressions and emotional reactions were a little on the melodramatic side. (POSSIBLE SPOILERS)Ben Kingsley gets pissy because the two kids find out that he used to make movies? Hugo throws a fit because the automaton didn't work as he expected to? I don't think these were appropriate responses to their situations.

The one good thing I have to say about this movie is that the visuals were absolutely gorgeous. From the cold blue lighting in the snowy outdoor scenes, to the orange-y warmth of the train station, to the powerful metallic essence of the gears and clockwork in the tower, this movie has some of the best 3D effects that I've seen since that awful, shallow Avatar. The problem is, the magical visuals cannot make up for the drab and very UN-magical story.

Overall, the magical, engaging adventure the trailers promised does not exist. The movie's pace is very slow. Some of the acting is questionable. The visuals were good, but they didn't save the movie. Do not go to this movie expecting something with substance. And definitely do not bring your kids to this movie; they will be bored to tears.

5 years ago

Visually Stunning. The best 3D to date

5/10 Saw it today in a sneak preview today at the Director's Guild in LA. James Cameron who was there professed it's a masterpiece and the best 3D to date. And he's right on both fronts. The film is exquisitely crafted. The cinematography and set design is likely going to take home a couple gold guys. It's a film lover's dream movie. As with many of Scorsese's films, it's an inspired film history lesson along side of being a dreamlike children's fable. A really unique combination that will work for the film enthusiasts and discerning family's with kids. Maybe a bit long for broad audiences with very little kids, but the images are so enchanting, it should win over most everybody. Sasha Baron Cohen is a brilliant and hilarious standout as the twitchy constable. It should be very well received just on the 3D alone.

5 years ago

An Empty Candy Wrapper..

1/10 Hugo is a beautifully made movie with great 3D effects. Yet with the misleading advertising, the story that goes nowhere, and with over 2 hour runtime it is one hell of a boring movie.

Please do not believe 8.3 IMDb and 94% RT ratings, this movie one of the most overrated movies in the history of the film, the word 'history' is the key one here. When everything is said and done Hugo reveals itself as nothing but a cleverly disguised homage to one of the French pioneering movie directors, a subject interesting primarily for the movie history buffs.

As I said Hugo is hugely misrepresented in advertising. Every poster tells you that some Narnia type adventure is awaiting you. All the trailers were masterfully crafted to leave you with expectation of magical miracle. The words like 'quest' and 'mystery' are a part of Hugo's brief description on each and every site, just read what it says on IMDb. Furthermore the word "adventure" is lavishly sprinkled throughout the Hugo's first part. And yes, great Martin Scorsese is behind all of it, so what should you expect but a magical adventure on a grandeur scale ?

Sorry, you will get none of that. Yes, Hugo is like a charming 3D French postcard, but its not worth looking at for over 2 hours. 3D effects are well done, yet absolutely not required for this story that never leaves the setting of Paris train station.

While plot has some holes, the elephant in the room is that pretty much nothing happens in the movie with all these mechanical dolls, golden keys, and the visually rich Dickensian atmosphere. And be sure, there is absolutely no magic, or any type of adventure hidden here.

I am giving Hugo just one star to counter misleading ads and all those hypists that ether work for the studio, or easily hypnotized by big director's name. Please have few good games on your smartphone and bring a thermos with coffee if you decide to go see this snoozefest, you will need it.

5 years ago

who's reviewing this??

1/10 A movie about the silent film industry with an automaton set in a train
station? Sounds good doesn't it. This was a movie with potential, but
it fell short so much so that I'm not going to waste my time giving it
a detailed, complete critique. So here's the bullet points: The
transitions were horrendous. The scenes jumped so much that half the
time i didn't know where the characters were or where they were going.

The boy who played Hugo was terrible. He was hired for his blue-sad eye
stare. That was it, no range of emotion past the stare.

The Station Inspector was a strange character. When you make an injured
war veteran the comic relief (not in a heartwarming way, but a feels
awkward to laugh at his injury sort of way) there's something wrong.
Pitiable and sad to hear others in the theater laugh at him.

The dialog was vapid and moronic. "Everything has a purpose in life...
even machines". Well ya, machines have a purpose otherwise we wouldn't
bother having them!! I could bury myself with all the plot holes in
this movie. Nuf said.

Overall no heart to the story. I can't waste anymore time reviewing
this disappointing movie. Bottom line: Don't bother.

5 years ago

A HUGO Disappointment - Melies made better movies than this

1/10 I was frankly stunned at how BAD this movie is. The 3D is very well done, but like all the clockwork and machines the movie revels in, "Hugo" is technically brilliant, moves like an elegant automaton, and has NO heart or soul. It is dead and hollow within.

The "plot" is confusing, the script seems to be more dictated over a cell phone than written, the lead character looks like an animated corpse, and it is DULL, DULL, DULL, DULL, DULL. My boyfriend actually fell asleep. It is terrible that a technique such as 3D seems to have totally eliminated the need for a decent plot, script, characters, motivation and some essence of believability. Scorsese also has to re-learn the use of editing as the movie is too long by at least a half hour, and the pace limps slower than the villainous station cop's leg.

The acting was competent except for Sacha Baron Cohen who is nearly unwatchable as the aforementioned gendarme - if he would only get a wooden leg it would match the rest of his performance.

The "plot" manipulates emotions rather than inspires them, and is unbelievably pedantic. It's like watching Scorsese lecture a Film 101 class. ***SPOILER?*** I could not believe the scene in the library where the children actually PULL OUT A BOOK and start lecturing the audience about the history of movies up to that point. Stunningly awful.

The great irony is that George Melies made FAR FAR FAR greater movies, even with his limited technology than this putrid piece of dreck. "Hugo" is a shameful waste of $170 million dollars. The Melies clips are the ONLY part of this debacle that have life, art, wit, color, and are actually entertaining.

PULEEEZZZZZ....Marty....put down the camera for GOOD, and stay in the lecture hall. You have lost the ability to make captivating, interesting movies that speak to normal, living people. If you want to make a movie about Melies, or educate the audience....make a documentary.

5 years ago